The Evolution of Out-of-Home Advertising: From Traditional to Digital to “Fake”
The Out-of-Home (OOH) advertising landscape in Asia is undergoing a remarkable transformation, with investments and innovations reshaping how brands connect with audiences in public spaces. Let's explore this evolution and the emergence of an intriguing new trend: Fake Out-of-Home (FOOH) advertising.
The Asian OOH Market: A Growing Investment
The Asian OOH advertising market demonstrates robust growth, with the average ad spending per capita projected to reach US$3.71 in 2024. In specific markets like Hong Kong, traditional billboard advertising costs can range from US$19,000 to US$128,000, while Singapore sees monthly rates between US$2,000 and US$15,000 for premium locations.
The Digital Revolution in OOH
The transition from traditional to Digital Out-of-Home (DOOH) advertising marks a significant shift in the industry. The Asia-Pacific DOOH market is set for explosive growth, expected to expand from US$19.26 billion in 2024 to US$34.45 billion by 2029, reflecting a remarkable CAGR of 12.34%. This growth is driven by enhanced data capabilities, programmatic advertising, and the ability to deliver more targeted, dynamic content.
Enter FOOH: The Next Evolution
Fake Out-of-Home advertising represents the latest innovation in the OOH space. Unlike traditional or digital OOH, FOOH creates the illusion of outdoor advertisements that don't physically exist, leveraging technologies like CGI and augmented reality to create shareable, viral content.
How FOOH Works
FOOH campaigns typically involve:
- Creating hyper-realistic digital content that appears to exist in real-world locations
- Utilizing advanced CGI and AR technologies
- Designing content specifically for social media amplification
- Blending reality with digital elements to create surprising, shareable moments
The Technology Behind FOOH
FOOH is powered by:
- Advanced Computer-Generated Imagery (CGI)
- Augmented Reality (AR) technology
- High-quality video production
- Social media integration tools
Success Stories in FOOH
Several major brands have successfully leveraged FOOH:
- Mattel's Barbie campaign in Dubai featuring a giant walking Barbie
- Maybelline's Sky-High mascara campaign across New York City and London
- JD Sports' creative Big Ben activation
- Marvel's Spider-Man 2 launch in Paris
WE-AR's FOOH Success: The Chupa Chups Case Study
A notable example of FOOH's potential is WE-AR's collaboration with Chupa Chups. The campaign, set against Seoul's Seokchon Lake, featured a virtual Ferris wheel that would have been cost-prohibitive to construct in reality. The campaign achieved remarkable success with 10 million cumulative views, demonstrating FOOH's ability to create impactful, shareable content at a fraction of the cost of traditional OOH installations. View the campaign here. Read about their Case Study here.
FOOH vs Traditional OOH: Key Advantages and Disadvantages
Advantages of FOOH:
- Lower production and placement costs
- Greater creative flexibility
- Higher viral potential
- Enhanced engagement through social media
- Easier to modify and update content
Disadvantages of FOOH:
- Limited to digital viewing
- Requires social media distribution
- May not reach traditional OOH audiences
- Dependent on digital engagement
As the advertising landscape continues to evolve, FOOH represents an exciting frontier that combines creativity, technology, and social media engagement to create memorable brand experiences. While traditional OOH and DOOH remain valuable, FOOH offers a new way for brands to capture attention and drive engagement in an increasingly digital world. Curious about how you can marry the best of both worlds? Have a chat with us!
Mad About Marketing Consulting
Advisor for C-Suites to work with you and your teams to maximize your marketing potential with strategic transformation for better business and marketing outcomes.
Citations:
[1] https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/advertising/out-of-home-advertising/asia
[2] https://adintime.hk/en/blog/2024-guide-outdoor-advertising-ooh-costs-in-hong-kong-n124
[3] https://adintime.com/en/blog/ooh-out-of-home-formats-and-rates-n35
[4] https://www.billboardsin.com/market/singapore-singapore-singapore/billboards/
[5] https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/advertising/out-of-home-advertising/southeast-asia
[6] https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/asia-pacific-digital-out-of-home-dooh-market
[7] https://mediaonemarketing.com.sg/out-of-home-advertisement-work-singapore/
[8] https://www.marketingcharts.com/cross-media-and-traditional-232272
Who rules - Preference or Performance Marketing?
Companies who are still keeping two separate team strategies between performance and preference marketing are setting themselves up for longer term failure
Such companies are failing to connect the dots between full funnel marketing and over simplifying the consumer decision making process and mindset.
This is especially in the digital ad space where borders are blurred or non-existent and privacy settings no longer allow for precision targeting the way we desire.
Preference and performance simply should go hand in hand as end day, we don’t simply blow marketing dollars for the sake of it. What’s awareness to someone is consideration to another and conversion to someone else, depending on the decision making journey your customer sits in relation to the product or service and your company.
This is certainly not that new, when I went through the Google certification course back in 2019 but am still surprised that some are only talking about this in recent years.
What’s more shocking is the way some companies are still insisting on measuring marketing returns on investment by not having attribution beyond vanity impressions, page views and clicks on pretext that it’s just for awareness. On the other end of the spectrum is insisting that if a certain ad doesn’t result in immediate conversion, then it’s a failed campaign on pretext it’s for performance.
Whatever happened to looking at the funnel, who you really are trying to target, where in the decision making funnel they are at, how compelling is whatever you are offering, and ensure you are connecting the dots on your messaging in different formats, in order to determine the right metrics to measure at each touchpoint?
Example – this week, you have an ad talking about how xx product will help solve xx issue that customers face today. A few days later, you have another ad referring to the same product promoted on a site that your target customers frequent. A few days later, you serve up another ad that has a tactical offer with a buy by xx date.
Companies who know who they are targeting and who are responding to their ads versus those who aren’t, will create segmented lists that differentiate the two. They will use one for remarketing with differentiated messaging to help catch their target customers along the funnel with the above messaging and offer so they maximize their media budget. This process should ideally be automated.
Another critical thing to do is to try to get target customers to sign up and start a relationship with you, by giving them reason to of course through insights, tips or deals that matter to them, especially critical with the sunsetting of cookies.
This goes hand in hand with understanding their digital footprint so you have a multi-dimensional view of your target customers as real people with interests, preferences and needs, beyond outdated attributes like age.
All in all, companies need to invest in the full funnel and have different measurements for each stage of the funnel.
About the Author
Mad About Marketing Consulting
Ally for CMOs, Heads of Marketing and C-Suites to work with you and your marketing teams to maximize your marketing potential with strategic transformation for better business and marketing outcomes.