The Mercedes Chicken Ad: When Viral Marketing Ruffles Luxury Feathers
When Mercedes-Benz released their "Chicken" advertisement featuring chickens dancing to Diana Ross while demonstrating their Magic Body Control suspension system in 2013, they created more than just a viral moment - they sparked a fascinating case study in automotive marketing, competitor response, and brand positioning.
The Creative Concept and Its Impact
Created by German agency Jung von Matt/Neckar, the advertisement took a unique approach to demonstrating Mercedes' sophisticated suspension technology. By showing chickens maintaining perfectly stable heads while their bodies moved to music, the ad created an entertaining parallel to how the Magic Body Control system works in Mercedes vehicles.
The numbers speak for themselves:
- Over 26 million views across social media platforms
- Winner of Auto Express's "Best Car Ad of the Year" with 51% of reader votes
- Generated significant organic social media buzz and discussion
The Criticism: Entertainment vs. Value Proposition
Despite its viral success, the advertisement faced several legitimate criticisms:
1. Product Information Gap: The ad prioritized entertainment over clearly explaining the technology's benefits to drivers. While viewers remembered the dancing chickens, the meaning behind this was lost on some, who struggled to connect this to the actual value of the suspension system. Personally, to me, it was clever and cheeky and more related to their value proposition than the Jaguar advertisement.
2. Brand Alignment Concerns: Critics argued that the whimsical nature of dancing chickens didn't align with Mercedes' prestigious brand image. The luxury automotive sector typically emphasizes sophistication and engineering excellence - elements that some felt were overshadowed by the advertisement's playful approach. Again, we might be splitting hairs here and bordering on being snobbish with this line of thinking.
3. Originality Concerns: The concept wasn't entirely new, as FujiFilm had previously used chicken head stability to demonstrate their camera stabilization technology. This raised questions about creative integrity in advertising. This to me is the biggest issue though some might argue that it’s similar to using say a fast-running animal to demonstrate speed, which is quite common. Chickens in this case, is rarely used in that context.
The Jaguar Response: A Lesson in Competitive Marketing
Ironically, Jaguar came up with its own ad to show a Jaguar eating the chicken. Their response ad, showing a jaguar eating the chicken and promoting "cat-like reflexes," achieved approximately 2 million views - significantly less than Mercedes' original. Jaguar's attempt to capitalize on Mercedes' viral moment provides interesting insights into competitive marketing dynamics.
This disparity in engagement highlights an important marketing principle: derivative content, even when clever, rarely achieves the same impact as the original. Ironically, Jaguar's response may have actually reinforced Mercedes' market position by drawing more attention to the original campaign.
Critical Lessons for Brands
1. Balance Entertainment with Brand Messaging
- Viral potential shouldn't overshadow core brand values
- Complex features need clear, compelling value communication
- Entertainment should enhance, not replace, product understanding
2. Brand Consistency Matters
- Even successful viral content needs to align with brand positioning
- Luxury brands can maintain their sophisticated image without losing their creativity and sense of humour
- Innovation in advertising shouldn't compromise brand identity
3. Competitive Responses
- Response campaigns need strong independent value propositions
- Timing and execution are crucial for competitive marketing
- Simply riding on a competitor's success rarely yields equal results
4. Ethics and PR
- Mercedes' transparency about animal welfare (the chickens were well-cared for and even laid eggs during filming) added positive PR
value
- Ethical considerations can enhance campaign success
- Behind-the-scenes positivity can create additional marketing opportunities
Conclusion
The Mercedes "Chicken" advertisement represents both the opportunities and challenges of viral marketing in the luxury sector. While it achieved remarkable reach and engagement, it also raises important questions about brand alignment and value proposition communication.
For marketers, this case study demonstrates that viral success alone doesn't guarantee effective brand communication. The key lies in finding the sweet spot between entertainment value and brand message - a balance that becomes increasingly crucial as brands compete for attention in the digital age.
The campaign's legacy serves as a reminder that even highly successful viral content should be evaluated against broader brand strategy goals. As the consumer industry continues to evolve, maintaining this balance between innovation in marketing and brand consistency will become ever more critical for success.
Curious about the Mercedes chicken ad versus the Fujifilm ad? Watch them here for yourself:
- Mercedes
- FujiFilm
Mad About Marketing Consulting
Advisor for C-Suites to work with you and your teams to maximize your marketing potential with strategic transformation for better business and marketing outcomes.
Citations:
https://digitalsynopsis.com/advertising/mercedes-benz-chicken-magic-body-control/
https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/mercedes-chicken-crowned-best-car-ad-year-auto-express/1303871
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a15368820/mercedes-benz-chicken-magic-body-control-commercial-a-pluckin-rip-off-the-ad-section/
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/mercedes-benzs-chicken-ad-dancing-feathers-stability-yash-dixit-9mk3f
https://blogs.ubc.ca/ian0623/2013/10/10/mercedes-benz-magic-body-control/
https://www.branding.news/2020/11/05/tbt-whats-the-resemblance-between-a-mercedes-car-and-a-chicken/
https://www.campaignlive.co.uk/article/mercedes-uses-disco-chickens-prove-driving-comfort/1213633
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/mercedes-benz-new-campaign-demonstrates-chickens-steady-head/articleshow/23768861.cms
https://www.cars.com/articles/jaguar-spoofs-mercedes-chicken-ad-1420663037124/
From Brand Love to Brand Relevance: A New Paradigm in Brand Building
In the evolving landscape of brand marketing, we often hear about the pursuit of "brand love" – that magical connection where consumers don't just buy your product but fall in love with your brand. But what if we're asking the wrong question? What if the goal isn't to be loved, but to be genuinely understood and valued?
The Paradigm Shift: From Love to Relevance
The truth is, your brand isn't about making customers love you. It's about understanding what they need from you and delivering it consistently. Success isn't measured by how many hearts your brand can capture, but by being top-of-mind when your customers have a need, want, or aspiration.
This shift from pursuing brand love to building brand relevance isn't just semantic – it's strategic. Here's why it matters and how to make this transition effectively.
The Three Pillars of Brand Relevance
1. Define Your Value Proposition
Start with your "Why, What, and How." This isn't just about crafting a clever mission statement – it's about crystallizing the value you bring to your target customers. What problems are you solving? Why should they choose you? Your value proposition should answer these questions clearly and convincingly.
2. Embrace Your Specific Audience
One of the biggest mistakes brands make is trying to be everything to everyone. Remember: You can't – and shouldn't – try to appeal to everyone. Your brand's strength isn't measured by universal appeal but by its resonance with those who matter most to your business. Are you building a brand that demands attention, or one that earns it through consistent value delivery?
3. Foster Organic Brand Presence
Think about brands like Panadol, Pampers, or Coca-Cola. When people have a headache, need diapers, or want a cola, these brands come to mind automatically. Why? Because they've established themselves not just through advertising, but through consistent delivery of value. It's what customers say about you when you're not advertising that truly defines your brand.
The Integration Imperative
When leaders ask me about improving brand perception and scores, they're often asking the wrong question. Instead, ask: "What broke down for our customers?" Because brand relevance requires holistic integration across:
- Sales interactions
- Customer service
- Employee behavior
- Leadership visibility
- Digital presence
When any of these touchpoints fails, customer trust erodes. Why? Because you're no longer doing right by them. You're not giving them what they want or need. They feel betrayed.
Building Sustainable Brand Value
1. Maintain Unwavering Consistency
- Across all channels
- Through time
- In messaging and delivery
2. Align with Your Target Audience
- Speak their language
- Address their specific needs
- Show up where – and when – they need you
Think of it as a relationship where loyalty is as good as your ability to serve their needs.
3. Demonstrate Value Continuously
Don't fall into the "too big to fail" mindset. Instead:
- Prove your worth through actions
- Deliver meaningful solutions
- Create tangible impact
Remember: It's a perpetual courtship.
4. Recognize and Reward Loyalty
Too many companies focus on acquiring new customers at the expense of existing ones. Build sustainable value by:
- Rewarding continued engagement
- Building long-term relationships
- Creating organic advocate communities
The Bottom Line
The question isn't whether your brand is loved – it's whether your brand is relevant. In today's market, relevance beats romance every time. Your brand's strength lies not in universal appeal but in its ability to consistently deliver value to those who matter most.
Are you building a brand that demands attention, or one that earns it through consistent value delivery? The answer to this question might just be the key to your brand's future success.
Mad About Marketing Consulting
Advisor for C-Suites to work with you and your teams to maximize your marketing potential with strategic transformation for better business and marketing outcomes.
Why Brand Management is Everyone’s Responsibility
Something I’m sure that has every marketing leader or brand leader tearing their hair out besides seeing their brand scores tank is when they get all the blame for it. If only brand preference building and management is as easy as putting out your brand ad on a big bus, taxi or whichever platform that gets as many eyeballs as possible. If so, why not just put it on a huge sky scrapper (hey that’s done before actually!).
Such tactics (I call them tactics and not strategies) work better for “will you marry me” types of wedding proposals but to build brand preference, it takes way more than that. Similar to good customer experience management, brand management takes the whole organization, including your client facing employees and your client facing touchpoints to help uplift your brand.
Firstly, your brand needs to serve a purpose and address a need or multiple needs for your defined target customers. Secondly, you need to know what differentiates you from your competitors even if you are selling the same things. Just like Pepsi and Coca Cola, both are cola drinks but both have their differentiating factors and ultimately, appeal. Thirdly, is your brand voice, message and identity that you are bringing to life through your marketing campaigns, news about your organization, things that your client facing teams are telling your clients or prospects, right down to the things you do in the broader public facing community. Finally, you need to clearly define as well as upkeep the key channels you are positioning your brand on that serve as a communication touchpoint with your target audience.
Many business leaders think the buck stops with the marketing campaigns but the trickiest part about brand management is how to make your target audience see you the way you want to be perceived. This approach leads to a dystopia state of brand reputation and perception as you will see almost conflicting activities and messages being shared from your organization by various business functions working in silos but not realizing they are all trying to steer the same ship to avoid hitting an iceberg. This is because everyone ends up trying to chart their own course to reach the same destination instead of playing to their strengths and working as a team.
There is nothing more dysfunctional than multiple teams trying to launch different variations of what they think your brand stands for in order to meet their own KPIs (key performance indicators). A tactical offer, is not a brand management strategy, a segment representation is not a brand management strategy and a campaign telling people how good you are is certainly not a brand management strategy but all this will affect the perception of your brand. Companies need to take a giant step back to reflect on what you are trying to position out there in terms of your brand identity and whether that still stays true to the fundamental reason you deserve to exist as a brand that customers care about.
The third and last part of the brand management aspect is actually also the hardest to maintain. You have to make sure your client facing touchpoints are keeping up with the demand from a tech, process and user design perspective so nothing falls through the cracks for your customers trying to engage with you. Concurrently, you need to have a joint-up approach in what you do and say to your target audience, including the timeliness and/or appropriateness of certain actions or messages. It goes beyond having a good crisis communications protocol.
For example, if your digital platform or servicing touchpoint is having a breakdown, you definitely do not want your key spokesperson to go out with a media commentary boasting about how great your digital or client servicing capabilities are or run an ad showcasing “seamless digital or client servicing capabilities”.
It’s more important to ensure business functions are working collaboratively as part of business-as-usual in keeping each other abreast, including your brand, marketing and communications team when something breaks or if they are preparing for a major enhancement so they can pre-empt the customer impact for the better or for the worse. Your management meetings should have a cadence to exchange such information so it can be cascaded to working group level to formulate a pre-emptive and proactive communications and customer management approach.
Simply said, the brand is the soul of the company and everyone is responsible for brand and reputation management but in the right way and not just checking off a list.
About the Author
Mad About Marketing Consulting
Ally for CMOs, Heads of Marketing and C-Suites to work with you and your marketing teams to maximize your marketing potential with strategic transformation for better business and marketing outcomes.
Why Is It Hard for CMOs to Transform Their Teams
Any sort of transformation is disruptive to business-as-usual (BAU) and any disruption to BAU also means that productivity is hampered. Amidst trying to meet business and marketing goals, targets and objectives, CMOs and their teams often find it hard to simply adhere to BAU and transform concurrently, and you cannot blame them.
CEOs and COOs simply have to first understand that the transformation journey is not a simple one where you can see the end of the tunnel right from the beginning of where you start. It’s more like a long winding road with hoops, turns and circles, depending on the complexity of the problems you are trying to unpack, the processes you need to overhaul to the skillset and mindsets of the people you need to enhance and change.
It throws a spanner into the works and takes time away from the CMOs and their one-downs to even try and formulate a plan swiftly while still carrying the major decisions they need to make to deliver their plans on time. Often times, they simply don’t know where or how to start without putting a halt to certain initiatives, campaigns or programs.
It is also a case of over familiarity and attachment to current processes, tools and scope of work that can build up an inertia for change of any sort that calls for an overhaul of the marketing department. While some companies choose to refresh their CMO leadership team, they find themselves in an even worse-off situation.
Why you may ask. Well, if you look at it objectively, a new CMO as in any new leadership person who just joins an organization will need to learn about the culture, processes, team capabilities from scratch. That is the so-called teething or onboarding period where the old team is likely to view the new leadership with suspicion and is less open to sharing information on how things actually work for fear of judgment.
Worse, you expect the CMO to already have a plan on how to transform while trying to settle into the organization without knowing the ins and outs of how things work. This journey itself will take at least 9 months to a year to complete before transformation can actually take place. It definitely cannot be a cookie-cutter approach that the CMO brings and applies from their previous company as every company is unique. Also, not all CMOs even have that approach they can rely on, which means even more time trying to plan or learn it from scratch.
In my experience working with various leadership and organizational structures, often I find that as marketing leaders, we are not given a lot of leeway and time to transform, resulting in having to look at quick and cheap wins, often at the expanse of people. This is not ideal nor is it sustainable even if you see initial positive results in terms of either business or marketing returns. These results are often not sustainable for longer term growth and retention of their key talents.
This is simply because good people who are working for something beyond just a pay check would not want to be associated with such an organizational culture. And that culture is often changed for the worse or established as a result of the hasty changes to be made.
It might be worth considering having independent third parties partnering with you and your CMO to help alleviate some of the pressure of planning for that change, so they can still focus 100% on the BAU to keep the engine running on full tank. After all, that is what you are paying your CMO for and not simply to do a once-off transformation. In other words, think bigger picture and longer term.
About the Author
Mad About Marketing Consulting
Ally for CMOs, Heads of Marketing and C-Suites to work with you and your marketing teams to maximize your marketing potential with strategic transformation for better business and marketing outcomes.